video

Be amused at Lee Strobel *attempting* to disprove evol...

Added: May 2, 2006 | Comments: 17 | Total Plays: 1,906
Save to Favorites
Rate It: Rating: 88%
Embed Code: 

Share Video On...

The Web:

Video Details

Description:

Lee Strobel babbles on about how evolution is a lie, etc. Typical creationist stuff.

Total Plays: 1,906
Added: May 2, 2006
Comments: 17

Video Details

Description: Lee Strobel babbles on about how evolution is a lie, etc. Typical creationist stuff.more >

Text Comments (17)

Add a Text Comment
Previous  1  2  3  4  of  4  Next
  • Mar 16, 2009 5:37 AM
    "Stro­bel's state­ments are out­right lies" Ob­vi­ous­ly....His fist lie is say­ing "Dar­wini­an evo­lu­tion". There is no such thing. There is on­ly "evo­lu­tion". And Dar­win is a prop­er name.
  • Apr 7, 2008 6:07 AM
    I was just pok­ing around and the one thing I can say as a chris­tain is Gods words won't fall on death ears. So let them rant and dis­be­lieve we will have the last laugh Praise the lord Je­sus Christ
  • Apr 6, 2008 1:30 PM
    It ex­plains uni­ver­sal com­mon de­scent with grad­u­al mod­i­fi­ca­tion. This alone makes a lot of pre­dic­tion­s, such as that we will nev­er find an or­gan­ism lack­ing nu­cle­ic acid­s. Evo­lu­tion­ist cracked the ge­net­ic code, us­ing evo­lu­tion­ary think­ing.
  • Apr 3, 2008 6:04 AM
    If evo­lu­tion does not ex­plain how it all be­gan then what an­swers does it ul­ti­mate­ly provide?
  • Mar 18, 2008 12:44 AM
    This is a typ­i­cal mis­un­der­stand­ing of evo­lu­tion, it has noth­ing to do with the ori­gin of life, but rather com­mon de­scent and grad­u­al mod­i­fi­ca­tion . A much bet­ter refu­ta­tion of evo­lu­tion would be to find an or­gan­ism with non-​nu­cle­ic acid­s.
Previous  1  2  3  4  of  4  Next
Add a Text Comment

Cancel
Submit Comment

300 Character Limit

Posting spam is prohibited and is subject to deletion of your account.

Cre­ation "science"
 (see all)
advertisement